Carla gallo 1997 update#

(1983) ‘Optimal Sanctions for Antitrust Violations’, University of Chicago Law Review, 50, 652–678. (1980) Business and Government during the Eisenhower Administration: A Study of the Antitrust Policy of the Antitrust Division of the Justice Department. (1989) ‘Federal Antitrust Enforcement in the Reagan Administration: Two Cheers for the Disappearance of the Large Firm Defendant in Nonmerger Cases’, Research in Law and Economics, 12, 173–206. 5, Acts Relating to Procedure and Enforcement. 4, Acts Relating to Foreign Commerce Vol. 1, The Sherman Act and Fair Trade Amendments Vol. (1978) The Legislative History of the Federal Antitrust Laws and Related Statutes, Part I, The Antitrust Laws Vol. 8, Business and Government in America Since 1870 Series. (1994) Antitrust and Business Regulation in the Postwar Era, 1946–1964, Vol. (1979) America's Longest War: The United States and Vietnam 1950–1975. (1969) Punishment: The Supposed Justifications. Goldschmid (1990) Trade Regulation: Cases and Materials, 3rd edn. Parker (1994) ‘Criminal Penalties under The Sherman Act: A Study of Law and Economics’, Research in Law and Economics, 16, 1–73. Craycraft, and Shantanu Dutta (1986) ‘Incarceration and Fines: An Empirical Study of Antitrust Sanctions’, Review of Industrial Organization, 3, 38–66. Bush (1985) ‘Guess Who Came to Dinner: A Statistical Study of Federal Antitrust Enforcement for the Period 1963–1984’, Review of Industrial Organization, 2, 106–130. Gallo, Joseph C., and Vivek Goshal (1996) ‘Changes in Economic Activity, Political Stance and Variations in the Department of Justice's Antitrust Enforcement’, Working Paper, University of Cincinnati. (1967) ‘Criminal Sanctions under State and Federal Antitrust Laws’, Texas Law Review, 45, 1301ff.įortune Directory of U.S. Sykes (1996) ‘Corporate Crime’, Journal of Legal Studies, 25, 319–349.įlynn, John J. (1982) ‘Antitrust Pork Barrel’, Journal of Law and Economics, 25, 329–342.įischel, Daniel R., and Alan O. New Haven: Yale University Press.įaith, Roger L., Leavens, Donald R., and Tollison, Robert D.

(1990) ‘An Economic Analysis of the Criminal Law as a Preference-Shaping Policy’, Duke Law Journal, 1990, 1–38.Įlzinga, Kenneth G., and William Breit (1976) The Antitrust Penalties: A Study in Law and Economics. (1983) ‘Sentencing Antitrust Offenders: Reconciling Economic Theory with Legal Theory’, William Mitchell Law Review, 9, 75–100.ĭau-Schmidt, Kenneth G. Gallo (1997) ‘Antitrust Sanctions and a Firm's Ability to Pay’, Review of Industrial Organization, 12, 171–183.ĭau-Schmidt, Kenneth G. (looseleaf 1955–1991) CCH Bluebook.Ĭraycraft, Catherine, Joseph L. Washington: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.Ĭalkins, Stephen (1997) ‘Corporate Compliance and the Antitrust Agencies' Bi-Modal Penalties’, Law and Contemporary Problems, 60, 127–167.Ĭommerce Clearing House (1955–1994) Trade Regulation Reporter, United States Antitrust Case Summaries. New York: Basic Books.īriet, William, and Kenneth Elzinga (1986) Antitrust Penalty Reform: An Economic Analysis. (1978) The Antitrust Paradox: A Policy at War with Itself. (1985) ‘A Suggestion for Improving Antitrust Enforcement’, The Antitrust Bulletin, 30, 433–456.īork, Robert H. (1968) ‘Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach’, Journal of Political Economy, 76, 169–217.īlair, Roger D. Landis Gabel (1985) ‘The Economics of Antitrust Compliance’, Southern Economic Journal, 52, 673–692.īecker, Gary S. Boston: Little, Brown.īeckenstein, Alan R., and H. Kuplow (1988) Antitrust Analysis: Problems, Text, Cases, 4th edn. The principal source of data is the CCH Trade Regulation Reporter, commonly referred toas the CCH Bluebook which contains briefsummaries of all DOJ antitrust cases in order of theirfiling.Īreeda, P., and L. The following information for cases undertaken by theDOJ are reported: number of cases, choice of civil orcriminal remedies, alleged violations, corporateofficials prosecuted, won-loss record, civil andcriminal sanctions imposed, and length of theproceedings.

More detailed analysis isleft for future work. The purpose is to present the overall historicalrecord of DOJ antitrust activity as well as somepatterns in that history. To explore some implications for antitrustissues. To report these measurements in a concise andsystematic way inorder to encourage empiricalstudies of antitrust issues.Ĥ. To provide consistent andcomparable measures of antitrustenforcement effortby the Department of Justice.ģ.

Carla gallo 1997 update#

To update Posner's study ``A Statistical Study ofAntitrust Enforcement'’ (Posner, 1970, pp. This is an empirical study of Department of Justice(DOJ) enforcement of the antitrust laws.